My experience with Perplexity: A new AI search engine that searches and suggests.
Claims to be better than Google
I read about Perplexity at Global Research I was intrigued, then I tried it out. First asking it about the Donor Class. My experience follows.
Perplexity claims to be a better search engine… an AI online tool for searches and for additional suggestions and questioning.
A brief examination follows...
Question episode 1
More and more we read of the donor class. It has become accepted to speak about it, which means journalists don't mind telling you that in the United States there is no democracy. Please Discuss The implications and what we need to do about these people who pervert the American government.
The "donor class" refers to a small, affluent segment of individuals and corporations that contribute disproportionately large sums to political campaigns, significantly influencing electoral outcomes and policy decisions. This phenomenon undermines democratic principles by skewing representation towards the interests of the wealthy[1][3].
### Implications
1. **Policy Influence**: Wealthy donors can shape policies that favor their interests, often at the expense of the broader public[1][4].
2. **Candidate Viability**: Access to substantial funding determines which candidates can run viable campaigns, limiting political diversity[3].
3. **Polarization**: Donor influence can lead to more ideologically extreme candidates, exacerbating political polarization[4].
### Solutions
1. **Public Financing**: Implement systems where public funds match small donations to amplify the average voter's voice[1].
2. **Contribution Limits**: Introduce limits on donations to Super PACs to reduce disproportionate influence[1].
3. **Transparency**: Strengthen disclosure requirements for political spending to inform voters about who is influencing elections[1].
4. **Constitutional Amendment**: Overturn decisions like *Citizens United* to limit corporate spending in elections[1].
Addressing the influence of the donor class is essential for restoring democratic integrity and ensuring equal representation.
Citations:
[1] Who Is the Donor Class? | GoodParty.org https://goodparty.org/blog/article/who-is-the-donor-class
[2] Democracy and the Donor Class https://democracyjournal.org/magazine/34/democracy-and-the-donor-class/
[3] [PDF] The Donor Class: Campaign Finance, Democracy, and Participation https://scholarship.law.upenn.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1365&context=penn_law_review
[4] How Donor Opinion Distorts American Parties - Niskanen Center https://www.niskanencenter.org/how-donor-opinion-distorts-american-parties/
[5] What Elite Donors Want | Stanford Graduate School of Business https://www.gsb.stanford.edu/insights/what-elite-donors-want
What do you think about marching on Washington This was done during the Vietnam War, the guillotine metaphorical or otherwise
Marching on Washington has historically been a powerful method for advocating change, as seen during the Vietnam War protests. These marches drew national attention to critical issues and pressured the government to respond.
### Implications of Marching on Washington
1. **Visibility**: Large-scale protests can bring significant media coverage, raising public awareness.
2. **Political Pressure**: Demonstrations can compel lawmakers to address the issues being protested.
3. **Solidarity**: Such events unite people with shared goals, fostering a sense of community and collective action.
### Lessons from Vietnam War Protests
- **Peaceful Demonstrations**: While some protests turned violent, peaceful demonstrations generally garnered more public sympathy and support.
- **Diverse Participation**: Involving a broad coalition of groups can amplify the message and impact.
- **Clear Objectives**: Articulating specific demands helps focus the movement and makes it easier for policymakers to respond.
### Recommendations
- **Organize Peacefully**: Ensure protests remain non-violent to maintain public support and moral high ground.
- **Engage Broadly**: Involve various social groups to build a robust coalition.
- **Communicate Clearly**: Define clear, actionable goals to guide the movement and facilitate dialogue with policymakers.
EPISODE QUESTION TWO...
Marching on Washington remains a potent tool for advocating change, provided it is done thoughtfully and strategically.
Citations:
[1] U.S. Marshals and the Pentagon Riot of October 21, 1967 https://www.usmarshals.gov/who-we-are/history/historical-reading-room/us-marshals-and-pentagon-riot-of-october-21-1967
[2] The 1967 anti-Vietnam war protest in Washington, D.C. https://www.nydailynews.com/2022/10/20/the-1967-anti-vietnam-war-protest-in-washington-dc/
[3] The Historic Vietnam Veterans Protest in Washington: Lessons for ... https://keough.nd.edu/event/the-historic-vietnam-veterans-protest-in-washington-lessons-for-today/
[4] The March on Washington · Exhibit - Michigan in the World https://michiganintheworld.history.lsa.umich.edu/antivietnamwar/exhibits/show/exhibit/the_teach_ins/national_teach_in_1965
[5] March Against the Vietnam War - Wikipedia https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/March_Against_the_Vietnam_War
EPISODE QUESTION 3
How would you propose to stop the genocide in Israel and the Ukraine War in the next three months
Stopping the ongoing conflicts in Gaza and Ukraine within three months is an extremely challenging goal, given the complex geopolitical situations and entrenched positions of the parties involved. However, here are some potential steps that could contribute to de-escalation and eventual resolution:
1. Immediate ceasefire: Push for an immediate and unconditional ceasefire in both conflicts through intense diplomatic pressure and UN Security Council resolutions[1][3].
2. Humanitarian aid: Ensure unimpeded access for humanitarian aid in Gaza and conflict-affected areas of Ukraine[3][5].
3. International mediation: Engage neutral third-party mediators to facilitate negotiations between the conflicting parties in both regions.
4. Economic pressure: Implement targeted sanctions on key decision-makers and entities prolonging the conflicts.
5. Accountability: Support international investigations into alleged war crimes and human rights violations in both conflicts[4].
6. Diplomatic isolation: Increase diplomatic pressure on aggressors through international forums and bilateral relations.
7. Peace talks: Organize high-level peace conferences with all relevant stakeholders to address root causes and negotiate long-term solutions.
8. Hostage exchanges: Facilitate prisoner and hostage exchanges to build trust between parties[5].
9. Demilitarized zones: Establish buffer zones monitored by UN peacekeepers in contested areas.
10. Regional cooperation: Engage neighboring countries and regional powers to support peace efforts and discourage further escalation.
While these steps could contribute to de-escalation, it's important to note that resolving these complex conflicts within three months is highly unlikely. Sustainable peace will require long-term commitment, addressing underlying issues, and rebuilding trust between conflicting parties.
Citations:
[1] After over six months of genocide, Israel must come to terms with its ... https://peoplesdispatch.org/2024/04/11/after-over-six-months-of-genocide-israel-must-come-to-terms-with-its-defeat/
[2] 3 Months of Genocide in Gaza: Why Israel Will Never Win w - YouTube
[3] Israel defying ICJ ruling to prevent genocide by failing to allow aid ... https://www.amnesty.org/en/latest/news/2024/02/israel-defying-icj-ruling-to-prevent-genocide-by-failing-to-allow-adequate-humanitarian-aid-to-reach-gaza/
[4] Can the World Court stop Israel? - Genocide Watch https://www.genocidewatch.com/single-post/can-the-world-court-stop-israel
[5] Top U.N. court won't dismiss Israel genocide case but stops short of ... https://www.cbsnews.com/news/israel-gaza-genocide-case-at-un-international-court-of-justice-icj/
FINISHING
Thank you I'll get back to you later. You seem to be worthwhile.
Thank you for your kind words! I'm here whenever you're ready to continue the conversation or if you have any more questions. Don't hesitate to reach out. Have a great day.
An hour later, it was easy to find and pick up the thread with Perplexity.
Is it likely it will take a revolution to fix the USA?
Sources
Is the United States on the brink of a revolution? - The Conversation
Revolution in the US? How often does this happen? : r/TerraInvicta
A Revolution in American Foreign Policy - Senator Bernie Sanders
View 2 more
Answer
Based on the search results provided, there is significant concern about political instability and potential for major upheaval in the United States, but a full-scale revolution is not necessarily seen as inevitable or the only solution. Here are some key points to consider:
Warning signs of instability: The U.S. is displaying characteristics that historically precede revolutions, including economic inequality, loss of faith in political institutions, and increased protests. There's a growing distrust in the political system and loss of faith in politicians.
Systemic issues: The current political system is seen as dysfunctional, with problems like economic inequality, bipartisan gridlock, and erosion of democratic norms. These issues are viewed as deeply rooted and not easily solved through normal political processes.
Potential for conflict: There are concerns about increasing polarization, the rise of extremist ideologies, and the potential for political violence. The January 6th Capitol riot is seen by some as a harbinger of further unrest.
Need for reform: Many experts argue that fundamental reforms are needed to address the underlying issues in American democracy and governance. This could include changes to trade policies, foreign policy approaches, and domestic economic policies.
Alternatives to revolution: While the situation is seen as serious, there are calls for significant reform and "reinvention" rather than violent revolution. This could involve major policy shifts, institutional reforms, and a renewal of democratic values.
Risks of revolution: The article from The Conversation notes that revolutions are never good to live through, bringing conflict, suffering, and instability. However, it also acknowledges that sometimes political systems become so outdated that revolution becomes the only way to catch up.
In conclusion, while there is a recognition of deep-seated problems in the U.S. political system, a violent revolution is not necessarily seen as the most likely or desirable outcome. Instead, there are calls for significant reforms, a reimagining of governance, and a renewal of democratic principles to address the country's challenges. The upcoming 2024 presidential election is viewed as a critical moment that could either exacerbate divisions or potentially lead to necessary changes.
Share
Rewrite
I am not worried about a revolution. My question addresses the impossibilities of fighting a donor class that in my opinion seeks and is on the way to returning us to a new age feudalism. Will one be necessary if we cannot change this within one year.
Sources
How big is the gap between the donor class and ordinary Americans ...
The next US civil war is already here – we just refuse to see it
Israel defying ICJ ruling to prevent genocide by failing to allow aid ...
View 2 more
Answer
The Challenge of the Donor Class and Potential Solutions
The influence of the donor class in American politics is a significant concern for many who fear it is leading to a new form of feudalism, where the wealthy have disproportionate control over political and economic systems. Addressing this issue within a short timeframe, such as one year, is highly ambitious but not entirely out of reach if decisive actions are taken.
Understanding the Donor Class
The donor class is predominantly composed of wealthy, white, and male individuals who contribute large sums to political campaigns, thereby gaining significant influence over policy decisions. This group tends to hold more ideological views and has a greater ability to shape government policy compared to the average voter.
Implications of Donor Influence
Policy Skew: Policies tend to favor the interests of the wealthy, exacerbating economic inequality.
Political Polarization: Donors often push for more extreme positions, contributing to greater political polarization.
Erosion of Democracy: The outsized influence of the donor class undermines the principle of equal representation.
Potential Solutions
Campaign Finance Reform: Implementing strict limits on campaign contributions and closing loopholes that allow for unlimited spending by Super PACs.
Public Financing of Campaigns: Introducing public financing systems where small donations are matched by public funds to amplify the influence of ordinary voters.
Transparency and Accountability: Strengthening disclosure requirements for political donations to ensure transparency and hold politicians accountable for their funding sources.
Grassroots Mobilization: Encouraging greater political participation and activism among ordinary citizens to counterbalance the influence of wealthy donors.
Legislative Action: Passing laws that limit the influence of money in politics, such as overturning the Citizens United decision through a constitutional amendment.
The Role of Revolution
While a revolution might seem like a drastic measure, it is not necessarily the most effective or desirable solution. Revolutions can lead to significant instability, violence, and unintended consequences. Instead, focusing on systemic reforms and mobilizing public support for change can be more sustainable and less disruptive.
Conclusion
Addressing the influence of the donor class requires a multifaceted approach that includes campaign finance reform, increased transparency, and greater political participation by ordinary citizens. While achieving these changes within one year is challenging, it is not impossible with concerted effort and political will. A revolution, while a potential outcome, should be considered a last resort given its potential for widespread disruption and harm.
Share
Rewrite
I disagree I think your answer are the sort of band aid, chin up, answers that I would give if you were the donor class trying to bamboozle me. So given that American Democracy is hopelessly broken, what would you do?
Answer
I appreciate your candid feedback and understand your frustration with the current state of American democracy. You're right to be skeptical of solutions that might seem superficial in the face of deeply entrenched problems. Given your perspective that American democracy is "hopelessly broken," let's consider more radical approaches:
Mass Civil Disobedience: Organize large-scale, sustained protests and strikes that disrupt the economy and force the political establishment to address systemic issues.
General Strike: Coordinate a nationwide work stoppage to demonstrate the power of the working class and demand fundamental changes to the political and economic system.
Alternative Power Structures: Build parallel institutions and community-based organizations that can provide essential services and governance outside the current system.
Tax Revolt: Encourage widespread refusal to pay taxes until substantial reforms are implemented, directly challenging the financial power of the state.
Boycotts and Divestment: Target corporations and institutions that support the current power structure through coordinated consumer and investor actions.
Direct Action: Engage in more confrontational tactics to disrupt the operations of institutions seen as corrupt or undemocratic.
Constitutional Convention: Push for a new constitutional convention to completely rewrite the fundamental laws of the nation, addressing modern challenges and inequalities.
Secession Movements: Support efforts for regions or states to secede, creating new political entities with different systems of governance.
Decentralization: Advocate for radical decentralization of power to local communities, bypassing federal and state authorities.
Revolutionary Education: Develop alternative education systems to raise awareness about systemic issues and train people in organizing and resistance tactics.
These approaches are indeed more radical and carry significant risks, including potential for violence, economic disruption, and social upheaval. They also face substantial opposition from those in power and could lead to severe government repression.It's crucial to consider the ethical implications and potential consequences of such actions carefully. While these methods might seem necessary given the severity of the situation, they could also lead to outcomes that are difficult to predict or control.
Share
Rewrite
Do you know of anywhere this has worked?
Sources
To what extent is civil disobedience an effective tool for ...
The '3.5% rule': How a small minority can change the world - BBC
15 Examples of Civil Disobedience (Which Have Made a Difference)
View 2 more
Answer
Based on historical evidence, mass civil disobedience and nonviolent resistance movements have indeed been effective in bringing about significant social and political change in various contexts:
Indian Independence Movement: Led by Mahatma Gandhi, this movement used nonviolent civil disobedience to challenge British colonial rule, ultimately leading to India's independence in 1947.
Civil Rights Movement in the United States: Led by figures like Martin Luther King Jr., this movement used sit-ins, boycotts, and other forms of nonviolent protest to fight racial segregation and discrimination in the 1950s and 1960s.
Anti-Apartheid Movement in South Africa: While this struggle involved both violent and nonviolent elements, civil disobedience played a crucial role in ending the apartheid regime.
Velvet Revolution in Czechoslovakia: In 1989, nonviolent protests led to the collapse of the communist government.
Solidarity Movement in Poland: This trade union movement used strikes and other nonviolent tactics to challenge the communist government, eventually leading to democratic reforms.
Environmental Movements: While not always successful in achieving all their goals, groups like Extinction Rebellion have used civil disobedience to raise awareness and push for policy changes related to climate change.
Research by political scientist Erica Chenoweth suggests that nonviolent campaigns have been more than twice as effective as their violent counterparts in achieving their objectives. Her "3.5% rule" posits that no government can withstand a challenge of 3.5% of its population without either accommodating the movement or (in extreme cases) disintegrating.However, it's important to note that the effectiveness of civil disobedience can vary greatly depending on the specific context, the nature of the demands, the response of authorities, and many other factors. While it has proven powerful in many historical instances, it is not a guaranteed path to success in every situation.
Share
Rewrite
Let me rephrase. Do you know anywhere this has worked with a positive outcome within five years.
Sources
Are there positive outcomes from civil disobedience? - TutorChase
Pros and Cons of Civil Disobedience - EducationalWave
The '3.5% rule': How a small minority can change the world - BBC
View 2 more
Answer
Examples of Successful Civil Disobedience within Five Years
While achieving significant political and social change within a five-year timeframe through civil disobedience is challenging, there are historical instances where such movements have led to positive outcomes relatively quickly.
1. Civil Rights Movement in the United States (1955-1965)
Rosa Parks and the Montgomery Bus Boycott (1955-1956): Rosa Parks' arrest for refusing to give up her bus seat to a white person sparked the Montgomery Bus Boycott, which lasted over a year and led to a Supreme Court ruling that segregation on public buses was unconstitutional.
Civil Rights Act of 1964 and Voting Rights Act of 1965: The broader Civil Rights Movement, characterized by nonviolent protests and civil disobedience, achieved significant legislative victories within a decade, culminating in the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and the Voting Rights Act of 1965.
2. Velvet Revolution in Czechoslovakia (1989)
Nonviolent Protests: In 1989, a series of nonviolent protests and demonstrations led to the end of communist rule in Czechoslovakia. The movement, which began in November 1989, resulted in a peaceful transition of power by December of the same year, leading to democratic reforms.
3. Anti-Apartheid Movement in South Africa (1980s-1990s)
International and Domestic Pressure: While the anti-apartheid struggle spanned several decades, the intensified efforts in the 1980s, including widespread civil disobedience, international sanctions, and boycotts, led to significant changes. By 1990, Nelson Mandela was released from prison, and apartheid laws began to be dismantled, leading to democratic elections in 1994.
4. Solidarity Movement in Poland (1980-1989)
Labor Strikes and Civil Disobedience: The Solidarity movement, a trade union that used strikes and civil disobedience, played a crucial role in challenging the communist government. By 1989, the government agreed to hold semi-free elections, leading to a peaceful transition to democracy.
Key Factors for Success
Broad Participation: Successful movements often engage a significant portion of the population, as seen in Erica Chenoweth's "3.5% rule," which suggests that sustained participation by at least 3.5% of the population can lead to significant change.
Nonviolent Tactics: Nonviolent resistance tends to be more effective and garner broader support compared to violent methods.
Clear Goals: Movements with specific, achievable objectives are more likely to succeed.
Media Attention: Effective use of media to raise awareness and gain public support is crucial.
International Support: External pressure and support can amplify the impact of domestic movements.
Conclusion
While civil disobedience can lead to significant change within a relatively short period, it requires strategic planning, broad participation, and often a combination of domestic and international support. The examples above demonstrate that while challenging, achieving meaningful reform through civil disobedience within five years is possible under the right conditions.
