Discussion about this post

User's avatar
arthur brogard's avatar

second major point i see is Hudson's point that Chinese imports to the USA are often from American owned factories in China. Potent! Staggering. Need some stats on percentages but potentially destroys the whole bogeyman.

arthur brogard's avatar

20% of population against 5% of arable land sounds significant but isn't necessarily so. It all depends upon how much arable land the 20% needs. If they could feed themselves adequately on 0.5% of the world's arable land the apparently significant juxtaposition is revealed as really irrelevant.

Obviously an implied need for 100% of the world's population to require 100% of the world's arable land. Pretty ludicrous.

5 more comments...

No posts

Ready for more?